The Descent of the Absolute

Microcosm-macrocosm Robert Fludd

In Man and his Becoming, Rene Guenon describes the manifestation of the Self into the human state according to the Vedanta. The West has its own Traditional understanding. It is not different, but it is worth the trouble to redo the same project in more Western terms. This post can be the barest outline, and specific topics will be developed in future posts.

By the Absolute, we mean generally what is called Brahman, that is, whatever is beyond being. The Self (Atma) is the principle of the individual. As such, the Self is beyond all manifestation and time. The descent through the degrees of being begins with formless manifestation, then to formal manifestation in the subtle state and ultimately to the gross state. This is not a process that occurs in time. Nor does the Self descend through these stages, since it is their principle.

A difficult notion to accept is that “time”, as we know it, is a feature of the human state. Once understood, however, many fruitless philosophical and theological conundrums are resolved.

The human state is said to be “rare”, in the sense that it is just one possible state out of many. The situation of the being in the human state allows the being to act in a way to acquire knowledge, unlike other states that are passive. Thus, it is special and should not be squandered.

These are the primary degrees although each one can be further divided, potentially indefinitively, into subdegrees. The Self becomes conscious of the world of sensible manifestation through:

  • Thought
  • Inward senses or wits
  • Individual consciousness
  • Five senses
  • Five organs of action
  • Life force

Buddhi

The buddhi, Universal Spirit, or Higher Intellect belongs to the realm of formless manifestation. As such it is the first degree of the manifestation of the Self. The possibilities of manifestation become ideas or essences in the Higher Intellect.

It is the principle of the formal manifestation of the Self and thus is the unifying principle. Rene Guenon calls it the “Spiritual Sun which shines at the center of the entire being.” Put another way, it is the “spark of divinity,” even if only virtually.

Thought is the faculty which gives form to ideas and associates them to each other; thought is how we experience the Higher Intellect.

However, in the Higher Intellect, it is not yet individual consciousness.

Manas

The characteristics of the Manas, or Universal Soul, relate to faculties of the formal order.

Mental faculty or inward sense. Individual thought, memory, imagination

Five elements: Ether, air, fire, water, earth
Five Senses: sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch
Five Wits: memory, estimation, fantasy, imagination, and common sense
Five actions: Ingestion, excretion, reproduction, locomotion, grasping

From the esoteric perspective, the senses are prior in the ontological sense. Moderns believe that somehow matter is creating sensations in the brain. The same for the other features. The desire for locomotion and grasping, for example, direct evolution. They are not the serendipitous results of a random evolutionary process.

Also, the ideas of the elements determine gross manifestation, not the other way around.

Causal Body

The causal body is the dividing line between pure Being and the individual being. As such, it is the essence of the human being, that is, what he is born with.  Boris Mouravieff explains it as analogous to the unfolding of a movie film:

Each human being, then, is born with his own particular film [destiny]. This represents the field of action in which man is called to apply his conscious efforts.

The causal body is still in the formless order. Rene Guenon describes it as

the totality of the possibilities of manifestation which Atma comprises within itself, in its ‘permanent actuality in the principial and undifferentiated state. [It] enjoys the plenitude of its own being, and it is in no way really distinct from the ‘Self’; it is superior to conditioned existence, which presupposes it, and it is situated at the level of pure Being.

But when viewed in relation to formal manifestation,

it can be said to represent principial or causal form, that by which form will be manifested and actualized in the succeeding stages.

Hence, it is the

principle and cause of all manifestation and the source from which manifestation is developed in the multiplicity of its different states and more particularly, as concerns the human being, in its subtle and gross states.

The principles and causes are described below.

Non-dual awareness

At the level of Being, the causal state is non-dual awareness, beyond the subject-object distinction. As such it creates the sensible world through the three forces:

  1. Active force: The idea or essential cause. This makes the world intelligible.
  2. Passive force: Matter or substantial cause. Matter is the principle of multiplicity. It is pure quantity without any qualities.
  3. Neutralizing force: Consciousness.

When the horizontal substantial cause meets the vertical essential cause, the thing arises. Yet it is not real unless and until there is consciousness. In the causal state, the virtual senses of the manas are actualized so that the world of the senses — or corporeal world — arises.

Yet there is no separation between subject and object, Self and the world. The self is said to participate in the world because there is no distinction.

Categories

The categories of being are the most general of all genera and determine the essence of the human being at birth. One’s essence is unalterable. The tendency today is to regard these categories as arbitrary, inessential, and even unjust. However, they make the being unique and distinct from other beings. Aristotle’s categories are helpful to understand this. Here are some examples.

Substance: Obviously, in this case, the substance is to be a human being.

Time and place: The human being is born at a particular time and place.

Qualities: The human being is born with certain qualities. These include the following, although it is unnecessary to specify precise details, which the reader can easily do.

  • Habits and Dispositions
  • Natural Capabilities and Incapabilities
  • Affective Qualities and Affections
  • Shape

Relations: this includes all the relationships that the being is born into. Among them are parents, family, nation, race, religion, and so on.

Sex: Sex is not a substance because both male and females are fully human, and not different species of the genus “human”. Nor does sex fit into a category of being, as the difference is above a category. Nevertheless, sex is not conventional, nor simply biological. Nevertheless, sex is “constitutive for the person” not an “attribute of the person”.

Messengers of Gods

In the Divine Comedy, Dante describes the ascent through the planetary spheres and the hierarchy of angels. In the descent of the being, the angels and celestial objects play a role in the progressive manifestation of the being.

The angels mediate the stages of manifestation.  In a moral world, there needs to be an adversary, which makes evil a possibility of manifestation. Hence, there are fallen angels that distort the process.

Macrocosm

The Microcosm is the Macrocosm is a truism in Hermetism. This must, however, be understood in its interiority, not as material forces and objects. This is the true astrology: the Spheres of Heaven correspond to aspects of our soul. Thus, there is the Moon of the being, Venus of the being, and so on. The effects of Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, understood in their interiority, on our lives need not belabored here.

Archetypes

Besides the archetypes which manifest from above, there are also

the archetypes which manifest themselves endlessly in history and in each individual biography — they are mythological symbols pertaining to the domain of time. (Valentin Tomberg)

For examples, the prophets can be understood that way: there is the Adam of the being, Noah of the being, Abraham of the being, and so on. Here only Adam concerns us, for the others are part of the re-ascent.

Adam is the father of all humankind. Due to that, we are born in a condition of ignorance, malice, concupiscence. This separates the human microcosm from the purity of the macrocosm. These conditions are not part of the being’s essence, because they can be altered and overcome in life. Hence, any attribute or quality that is sinful cannot be an essential part of the human being.

Ego

Thinking separates the nondual awareness of the causal state into subject and object. At this stage individuality is realized. Thought creates the idea of the Ego experiencing objects “out there, right now”. So Rene Descartes’ quip, “I think, therefore I am,” is exact, presuming that it refers to the Ego of the human state, not the Real Self. The Ego in the individual state forgets its true identity.

Subtle Body

The human being manifests as a subtle body and a gross, or physical, body. These correspond respectively to two of the conditions of manifestation: psyche (or life) and matter. So in addition to the features of the human being acquired from the vertical direction, he is also subject to the psychical and material currents active in the time and place of his birth.

The subtle body is further subdivided in three: the intellectual, animal (or emotional), and vegetable souls. The soul divisions are porous, so there are no hard divisions between them. Features of each can appear in the others. That is why animals can display intelligence or why a human can feel pleasure in intellectual attainment. More often, the mixture is deleterious. Mouravieff makes that clear:

In fact, we have neither a pure thought nor a pure feeling: nor are our actions pure. Everything in us is mixed and even entangled, often by all sorts of considerations which either come from the intellectual centre, tarnishing the purity of our feelings by its calculations, or from the emotional centre, which clouds the calculations of the intellectual centre.

Since this topic has been covered numerous times, we just need a cursory mention here. A full explanation would require a book.

Mental Body

Intellectual soul Activities related to thinking. The lower part includes opinons and discursive thinking. The higher part is intuitive thinking.

Astral Body

The Sensitive soul or animal soul is the center of the lower mental functions, emotions, feelings as well as refined sensations and passions;

Etheric body

Also known as vegetable soul or life body. This is the center of the faculties of action and sensation, which relate to the corresponding features of the Manas.

It also directs unconscious processes like nutrition, growth, secretion, and reproduction.

The motor centre governs instinctive life as well as movement and all mental activity: its action is thus distributed throughout the physical body.

Gross Body

Matter is not productive of anything. It is only alive when animated by the etheric body. When that latter separates from the gross body, the body dies and decays.

Even the gross body has levels: first, it is subject to the laws of physics, then those of chemistry, and finally biology.

Nevertheless, The qualities of the human being are determined ontologically prior to biological processes. Hence, biology does not create the human being, but rather the other way around.

Nevertheless, the gross body is the medium through which one’s destiny is played out. The physical world is the unconscious of the Self.

Level of Being

A fundamental principle is that what is ontologically prior comes after in time. Hence, at the level of the gross body, it appears that life (etheric body) follows matter, then consciousness, and eventually thought. In the temporal sense, the world appears to “evolve” from the lower to the higher.

However, ontologically there is no absolute standard of time, so the states are, from the viewpoint of the Self, simultaneous. Where the Self “is” in the states of the being is determined by where the Self is focusing consciousness.


Sources

Barfield, Owen: Saving the Appearances
Dante: Divine Comedy
Guenon, Rene: Man and his Becoming according to the Vedanta
Lewis, C. S.: The Discarded Image
Shankara: Tattva Bodhah, Commentary by Swami Tejomayananda
Shankara: Vivekacudamaṇi, Commentary by Swami Dayananda Saraswati
Mouravieff, Boris: Gnosis
Aristotle: Categories

8 thoughts on “The Descent of the Absolute

  1. Thank you!

  2. Thank you.

  3. You need one of those machines described in Eumeswil to ask those ancients who or what exactly ascends. Knowledge of one’s Self leads to knowledge of God, so nothing could possibly be greater.

    BTW, every time you change your byline, the comment has to go through moderation again. That really annoys me.

  4. It’s certainly odd then, that many ancients would speak of an ascent.

    If such a system were true, what could possibly be greater than to realize the nature of one’s self, then?

  5. The causal body does not ascend. It is one of the states of the Self, which neither ascends nor descends. Your crude identity is going to die, so it is hardly “your” choice. Why bother? Some people get excited about discovering the identity of the masked singer. Others aspire to something greater. Your call.

  6. “The causal body is the dividing line between pure Being and the individual being.”

    If that is the case, how does a causal body ascend to the level of pure Being, and beyond? And further, how could that which accompanies it–our crude personalities and souls, etc–ascend to and inhabit the states of the purely formless? Or can they not? And if they cannot, and the process is one of forgoing many of these cruder states to which we rely on for sustenance and identity, and purely identifying with the original principle of all manifestation, then why bother? Why manifest in the first place, and why sacrifice everything to return?

  7. I couldn’t help it; I see so many correlations to scholastic terminology. While I agree 100% that the scholastic terminology would often seem ambiguous and untenable, with the scholastics themselves constantly re-delegating certain aspects of various centers to different functions, I do think this could be ameliorated with greater care for precision and distinction. The scholastics also offer tremendous insights in this area, for those willing to piece things together. My understanding of the finer details on many of these subjects, especially as pertains to the Hindu conceptions, is admittedly wanting.

    * * *

    Buddhi, Manas, Causal Body

    You wrote: “Rene Guenon calls it [Buddhi] the ‘Spiritual Sun which shines at the center of the entire being.’ Put another way, it is the ‘spark of divinity,’ even if only virtually.

    Thought is the faculty which gives form to ideas and associated them to each other; thought is how we experience the Higher Intellect.

    However, in the Higher Intellect, it is not yet individual consciousness.”

    The Buddhi would seem, then, to correspond to both the Nous of the Orthodox ascetic tradition (if not the general nous of Greek philosophy), and the Active Intellect of the scholastics. In fact, it even seems to be a union of key aspects of the two concepts.

    The Nous is said to be agent–to some extent–over the spirit (vegetative power). Yet the Orthodox conception of the Nous is that it can only be experienced phenomenally, through reflection by the discursive faculty. That said, the Nous can be controlled by the will. Solar symbolism with this center is ubiquitous. Compare the above Guenon quote with the following from the Triads of Palamas:

    “Do you not see that [the hesychast saints] will acquire the same energy as the Sun of Righteousness? [It] becomes luminous by the power of the Spirit, and mingles with the true and sublime purity; it shines itself in this purity, becoming entirely radiant, transformed into light according to the promise of the Lord, who foretold that the just would shine like the sun.'”

    Additionally, Buddhi as described here corresponds to the Active Intellect, in that while, yes, it is related to the conversion of essences in the intellect, it is not a proper rational agent which participates in discursive thought per se, which action properly belongs to the passive intellect, itself corresponding to Manas. This passive intellect is tied explicitly with the human brain, making it originate, or at least chiefly correspond, first and foremost on the plane of physical manifestation.

    Unlike Manas, Aquinas differentiates between the centers responsible for sense perception and the cogitative functions. In the depths of the cogitative functions, even past them, he positions the ‘potential intellect’ (intellectus possibilis), beyond which (it is implied) lies the Soul.

    The Soul for Aquinas is quite literally the formal cause of man (the Causal Body). Mouravieffs’ description fits: it is the “principle and cause of all manifestation and the source from which manifestation is developed in the multiplicity of its different states…”

    * * *

    Categories

    The bit about the origin of sex is profound. Is it a form or an accident? For a scholastic look at this issue which isn’t terrible or blinded by politics, see: https://thinkingthoughtout.com/2016/04/06/the-metaphysics-of-gender/ In addition, I’ve found value in re-reading the relevant portions of Symposium. I have many questions on this.

    * * *

    Archetypes

    In a recent podcast between Jordan Peterson and Jonathan Pageau, Peterson was struggling with his own self-limiting, Jungian conceptions of the Archetypes. Pageau tried to convince him that the archetypes, more or less like the forms, are not simply constructs to aid in self-development but real and metaphysical realities which causally interact and guide manifestation. My own position on this is undetermined, but I would recommend the interview, up on Peterson’s YouTube channel. It was a very constructive conversation.

  8. The physical world is the unconscious of the Self.

Please be relevant.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright © 2008-2020 Gornahoor Press — All Rights Reserved    WordPress theme: Gornahoor