Vedanta and Western Tradition

Lacking nothing, contemplative, immortal, self-originated, sufficed with a quintessence: he who knows that constant, ageless, and ever-youthful Spirit, knows himself and does not fear death.
~ Shankara

In his important but little read essay, The Vedanta and Western Tradition, Ananda Coomaraswamy points the way for Europeans to come to an understanding of the metaphysics of the Vedanta. He begins with this advice:

The educated man of today is completely out of touch with those European modes of thought and those intellectual aspects of the Christian doctrine which are nearest those of the Vedic traditions. A knowledge of modern Christianity will be of little use because the fundamental sentimentality of our times has diminished what was once an intellectual doctrine to a mere morality that can hardly be distinguished from a pragmatic humanism. A European can hardly be said to be adequately prepared for the study of the Vedanta unless he has acquired some knowledge and understanding of at least

  • Plato
  • Philo
  • Hermes Trismegistus
  • Plotinus
  • Gospel of John
  • Dionysius the Areopagite
  • Meister Eckhart
  • Dante

Eckhart, with the possible exception of Dante, can be regarded from an Indian point of view as the greatest of all Europeans.

Here are some of the major highlights:

  • Metaphysics is not a system, but a consistent doctrine
  • It is concerned not only with conditioned and quantitative experience, but also with universal possibility
  • There are things which are beyond the reach of discursive thought and which cannot be understood except by denying things of them
  • The immanent Spirit within you is the only knower, agent, and transmigrant
  • Ultimate reality is a Supreme Identity in which the opposition of all contraries, even of being and not-being, is resolved
  • Its “worlds” and “gods” are levels of reference and symbolic entities which are neither places nor individuals but states of being realizable within you
  • For the metaphysician, it suffices to show that a false doctrine involves a contradiction of first principles
  • The quest is achieved only when he himself has become the object of his search
  • The Vedanta can be known only to the extent that it has been lived
  • Man is unaware of this hidden treasure within himself because he has inherited an ignorance that inheres in the very nature of the psycho-physical vehicle which he mistakenly identifies with himself
  • What is called “creation” in religion, is called “manifestation” in metaphysics
  • Only when we are convinced that nothing happens by chance that the idea of Providence becomes intelligible
  • Each human life has run its course when all its possibilities have been exhausted
  • Whatever has been an eternal reason or idea or name of an individual manifestation can never cease to be such; the content of eternity cannot be changed
  • All the states of being are within you, awaiting recognition

5 thoughts on “Vedanta and Western Tradition

  1. Just now revisiting this conversation…I wholly agree with your observations Cologero. Just adding some clarification to what has scientifically become an overriding and limited scientific dogma of ‘random chance’ made from limited observations, projections and consciousness
    .

  2. Pingback: » Land of the Twice-born

  3. Are you denying the Principle of Sufficient Reason?
    By “chance”, I think he means an event that is unrelated to anything else, either empirically or transcendentally. Hence, I would regard “synchronicity”, as that relationship. I don’t think you would see “synchronicity” as something purely arbitrary and subjective. On the contrary, in this sense, synchronicity is an even stronger indication of Providence.

    In a larger context, I don’t see Coomaraswamy as advocating determinism as the opposite of “chance”, if that is what you are objecting to.

  4. Coomaraswamy’s insights continue to be widely unmatched except by the founders and key saints of the Great Tradition.
    However, ‘chance’ becomes a first principle when understood as contingency which is invariably synchronistic. Thus, “Only when we are convinced that nothing happens by chance that the idea of Providence becomes intelligible” does not sufficiently penetrate the reality of Hierarchical Emergence and Fate on one side and Holistic Causality and Death on the other.

Please be relevant.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Copyright © 2008-2020 Gornahoor Press — All Rights Reserved    WordPress theme: Gornahoor